FAR Companion Change
| Date Detected | 2026-03-11 09:24 UTC |
| Type | COMPANION_MODIFIED |
| Entity | PART_19 |
Summary
PART_19 updated: 156 lines added, 1 lines removed
Diff
--- previous +++ current @@ -1 +1,159 @@ -Part 19 - Small Business ...........................................................................................................53+Part 19 - Small Business +FC 19.1 Innovative approaches to reduce bid and proposal burdens for increased small +business opportunities. +There are many opportunities to apply innovative techniques on the Periodic Table of +Acquisition Innovations (PTAI) to maximize small business opportunities. The techniques and +approaches found on the PTAI benefit small business in the following ways: +53 +Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Companion +● Reduced barriers to entry through simplifying the request for quote and request for +proposal process, lowering bid and proposal costs, streamlining submission processes, +and more clearly explaining the evaluation criteria and approach. +● Faster contract awards can help small businesses which may not be able to sustain +cash flows for burdensome, lengthy acquisition timelines. +● Commercial procurements, modular contracting, and agile procurement methods may +align more with how small businesses operate. +● Emphasizing solutions and mission over compliance attracts companies of all sizes and +affords companies to showcase their unique capabilities. +The PTAI has a finder feature that filters innovative acquisition approaches and techniques +which benefit small businesses. +FC 19.101(b) Encouraging small business participation in acquisitions. +There are many ways to encourage small business participation in acquisitions in addition to the +acquisition strategies outlined in FAR 19.101(b), which include, but are not limited to the +following actions that a contracting officer may consider: +● Identify opportunities to break down complex requirements into simpler parts whenever +possible, or divide proposed acquisitions of supplies and services (except construction) +into reasonably small lots (not less than economic production runs) to permit offers on +quantities less than the total requirement. +● Establish realistic delivery schedules that will encourage small business participation to +the extent consistent with the actual requirements of the government. +● Allow the maximum amount of time practicable for the submission of offers. +● Provide relevant information with solicitations that is necessary for the preparation of +quotes or proposals (e.g. specifications, plans, system designs, drawings). +FC 19.103(b) Determining the appropriate NAICS code for the solicitation. +When determining the appropriate NAICS code for the solicitation, it may be useful to consider +the industry descriptions in the U.S. NAICS Manual, the product or service descriptions in the +solicitation, the relative value and importance of the components of the requirement making up +the end item being procured, and the function of the goods or services being purchased. A +procurement is usually classified according to the component that accounts for the greatest +percentage of contract value. In the event of a NAICS code appeal, more information +concerning appeals of NAICS code designations can be found in the SBA’s regulations, and is +located at 13 CFR 121.1002 and 13 CFR part 134. +FC 19.104-1(f) Identification of manufacturers. +For the purposes of applying the nonmanufacture rule, the manufacturer, processor, or producer +is the concern that manufacturers, processes, or produces an end item with its own facilities +(e.g., transforms raw materials, miscellaneous parts, or components into the end item being +acquired). See 13 CFR 121.406(b)(2). In an acquisition for multiple items, if a small business +offeror is both a manufacturer of item(s) and a nonmanufacturer of other item(s), the contracting +officer should apply the manufacturer size standard. +54 +Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Companion +FC 19.108-11(a)(2) Release from the 8(a) program. +A requirement is automatically released from the 8(a) program if a follow-on procurement is set +aside for the HUBZone, SDVOSB, or WOSB programs, or a mandatory source is identified to +meet the requirement per FAR 19.108-11(a)(1). In such cases, a formal release request is not +necessary. This ensures that follow-on procurements remain within the small business program. +FC 19.109 Small business subcontracting plans. +When a subcontracting plan is required in accordance with FAR 19.109, the contracting officer +may require the submission of a subcontracting plan with the initial offers or at any other time +prior to award. From an efficiency perspective, unless proposed small business subcontracting +is a required evaluation factor in accordance with FAR 15.104(c)(2), or other extenuating +circumstances that warrant the evaluation of subcontracting plans apply, it is appropriate to only +require submission of a subcontracting plan by the apparent successful offerer and negotiate +the terms of the subcontracting plan with the apparent successful offeror prior to award. If +handled as a negotiation with the apparent successful offeror, the subcontracting plan +negotiation is separate and distinct from other negotiations that may occur under source +selection. +FC 19.110 Price evaluation preference for HUBZone small business concerns. +When evaluating price for HUBZone small business concerns, the factor of 10 percent should +be applied on a line item basis or to any group of items on which an award may be made. Other +evaluation factors, such as transportation costs or rent-free-use of government property, should +be added to the offer to establish the base offer before adding the factor of 10 percent. +When the two highest-rated offerors are a HUBZone small business concern and a large +business, and the evaluated offer of the HUBZone small business concern is equal to the +evaluated offer of the large business after considering the price evaluation preference, the +contracting officer should award the contract to the HUBZone small business concern. +FC 19.111-2 Set-asides for orders under multiple-award contracts. +The contracting officer is encouraged to consider, but has the discretion to decide, whether or +not to set aside an order under multiple-award contracts for small business concerns. +Accordingly, the “rule of two” (see FAR 19.104-1(a)) does not apply to orders placed under +multiple-award contracts, or to orders under the Federal Supply Schedules. +If the contracting officer decides to set aside an order for small business concerns, the specific +program eligibility requirements identified in FAR part 19, as well as the ordering procedures for +the Federal Supply Schedule (FAR subpart 8.4 and GSAR subpart 538.71) or a multiple-award +contract (FAR subpart 16.5) must be followed. The set-aside may be a total set-aside or a +partial set-aside (see FAR 19.104-2). When establishing a blanket purchase agreement under +the Federal Supply Schedule, the contracting officer may also establish a reserve for small +business (GSAR 538.7102-2(c)(1)). +A contracting officer’s decision to set aside or not set aside an order for small business +concerns is not a basis for protest (see 19.111-2(a)(2)). FAR 19.104-1(a) has been updated to +use "contracts" instead of "acquisition" for greater clarity. This particular clarification aims to +resolve a perceived conflict in interpretations between the Government Accountability Office +55 +Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Companion +(GAO) and the U.S. Court of Federal Claims (COFC) around the application of the "Rule of +Two" within the context of multiple-award contracts. +Note that only small business concerns awarded contracts under partial set-aside multiple- +award contracts may compete for orders issued under those portions of the multiple-award +contract. However, small business awardees may compete against other than small business +awardees for an order issued under the portion of the multiple-award contract that was not set- +aside, if the small business received a contract award for the non-set-aside portion of the +multiple-award contract. +Below are examples of language for consideration in a solicitation should the contracting officer +decide to set-aside an order under the Federal Supply Schedule or a multiple-award contract, or +conduct a reserve under the Federal Supply Schedule. This language is intended to aid the +contracting officer, and can and should be tailored to the specific acquisition, contract vehicle, +and set-aside decision. +FAR 8.4 or FAR 16.5: Total set-aside. +This language is suitable when setting aside the entire requirement for a specific small business +category. +Example: Total Small Business Set-Aside +"This order is a total set-aside for small business concerns. Only quotes submitted by +contractors that are currently designated as a small business under their awarded [insert +contract type, e.g., GSA MAS, IDIQ, etc.] will be considered for award. Any quote received from +a contractor that is not an eligible small business concern will be deemed non-responsive and +will not be evaluated." +Example: Total Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) Set-Aside +"This order is a total set-aside for Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Businesses +(SDVOSBs). In accordance with FAR 8.401(b) and GSAR 538.7102-2(c)(1) or FAR 16.505, only +offers from SDVOSBs will be considered. Any offer submitted by a contractor that is not a +certified SDVOSB will not be considered for award." +FAR 16.5: Partial set-aside. +This language may be used when soliciting an order or BPA under the set-aside portion of the +multiple-award contract when the multiple-award contract itself contains a partial set-aside +provision. +Example: Partial set-aside under an existing multiple-award contract +"This order is being solicited in accordance with the terms of the multiple-award contract [insert +contract number], including FAR 52.219-7 and 52.219-13. Offers are being solicited for the set- +aside portion of this requirement. In accordance with FAR 19.111-2, only small business +concerns awarded contracts for the set-aside portion(s) are eligible to compete." +56 +Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Companion +GSAR 538.702-2(c)(1): Reserve. +This language may be applied to a competitive multiple-award BPA under the Federal Supply +Schedule that includes a reserve for one or more small businesses. +Example: Reserve under Federal Supply Schedule multiple-award BPA +"This acquisition includes a reserve for one or more small businesses. In accordance with +GSAR 538.7102-2(c)(1), the contracting officer intends to reserve BPAs for one or more small +business concerns." +Combined FAR 8.4 and FAR 16.5 set-aside statement. +This statement can be added to the competitive announcement for orders under FSS or +multiple-award contracts. +Example: Notice of set-aside of orders +"In accordance with FAR [insert 8.401(b)/GSAR 538.7102-2(c)(1) or 16.505, as applicable], the +contracting officer has determined that this order will be set aside for [insert specific small +business category, e.g., small business concerns, SDVOSB, HUBZone, etc.]. All eligible +vendors holding a [insert contract type, e.g., GSA MAS, IDIQ, etc.] are invited to compete." +Tips for contracting officers when deciding to set-aside an order for small business: +● Specify the program: When creating the RFQ, specify the particular set-aside type (e.g., +Small Business, SDVOSB, WOSB, etc.) and insert the appropriate FAR clause to ensure +that only eligible contractors respond. +● Use eBuy features: For FSS orders, GSA's eBuy portal automatically includes the +appropriate set-aside language and filters the solicitation so that only eligible contractors +can view it. +FC 19.302-1(d) Small business subcontracting goals for orders against multiple-award +contracts. +To evaluate subcontracting goals for an order in accordance with FAR 19.302-1(d), contracting +officers should leverage the master subcontracting plan for the multiple-award contract, and not +require an individual order level subcontracting plan unless elements of the plan are considered +unacceptable for the order level requirement.