FAR Companion Change

Back to FAR Companion

Summary

PART_33 updated: 38 lines added, 1 lines removed

Diff

--- previous
+++ current
@@ -1 +1,38 @@
-Part 33 - Protests, Disputes, and Appeals .................................................................................84+Part 33 - Protests, Disputes, and Appeals
+FC 33.103 Solicitation clarity and execution.
+The most effective protest defense involves having a clear solicitation and following what you
+say you will do. Many protest issues may be preventable through proper execution against your
+solicitation requirements. Complex evaluation schemes with multiple factors, subfactors, and
+unclear evaluation criteria carry higher protest risk. Avoid using overtly constraining language
+that limits the government's permissible discretion during evaluation or source selection.
+FC 33.103 Technical evaluation safeguards.
+To ensure a defensible position during trade-off evaluations, precisely follow the solicitation
+evaluation criteria. Deviations from the stated methodology or the evaluation of unstated criteria
+is likely to lead to potential protests. When proposals offer capabilities beyond requirements, it is
+important to document whether these enhancements add value or are unnecessary. Strengthen
+the evaluation record by ensuring ratings align with solicitation definitions and are supported by
+specific rationale.
+FC 33.103 Documentation practices.
+Direct, succinct, and bulleted documentation makes it easier to assess and understand the
+rationale for government decisions. Maintaining clear contemporaneous records of evaluation
+rationale, decision points, and supporting analysis provides the foundation for defending award
+decisions.
+FC 33.103(b)(3) Referral to the agency suspending and debarring official.
+If a post-award protest is upheld due to an awardee's intentional or negligent misstatement,
+misrepresentation, or miscertification, the contracting officer should consider referring the issue
+to the agency's suspending and debarring official for review under FAR subpart 9.4.
+FC 33.105-1 Protests to GAO.
+GAO publishes and maintains an informal, practical guide to the bid protest process. It is
+available at Bid Protests at GAO: A Descriptive Guide (Tenth Edition, 2018) | U.S. GAO.
+FC 33.105-3 Strategic management of award notices, debriefings, brief explanations, and
+protest windows.
+To avoid unnecessarily extending the protest window, the acquisition team led by the
+contracting officer should prepare to quickly provide debriefings when requested after making
+award decisions and notifying unsuccessful offerors. This timing consideration is relevant
+because unsuccessful offerors generally have 10 calendar days to file a GAO bid protest from
+the date the basis of protest is known. Note that an automatic stay of performance at GAO is 10
+days after contract award or within 5 days of a debriefing date offered. Please note that if the
+last day of the computation period is a Saturday, Sunday, or Federal holiday, then the deadline
+for filing is the next day the protest venue (e.g., GAO, soliciting agency) is open.
+Additionally, when a "brief explanation" of the award decision is required (as opposed to a
+debriefing), such as when awarding an order under the Federal Supply Schedule or using FAR