FAR Companion Change

Back to FAR Companion

Summary

PART_37 updated: 103 lines added, 1 lines removed

Diff

--- previous
+++ current
@@ -1 +1,105 @@
-Part 37 - Service Contracting ....................................................................................................94+Part 37 - Service Contracting
+FC 37.001 Examples of service contracts.
+Service contracts may encompass various areas, including:
+● Maintenance, overhaul, repair, servicing, rehabilitation, salvage, modernization, or
+modification of supplies, systems, or equipment.
+● Routine recurring maintenance of real property.
+● Housekeeping and base services.
+● Advisory and assistance services.
+● Operation of government-owned equipment, real property, and systems.
+● Communications services.
+● Architect-Engineering (see part 36).
+● Transportation and related services (see part 47).
+● Research and development (see part 35).
+FC 37.1 Outcome-based contracting.
+Outcome-based contracting is a variation of performance-based contracting that emphasizes
+delivery of specific, defined outcomes through a collaborative, adaptive performance framework,
+94
+Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Companion
+rather than transactional delivery of specified services or products. The contract defines the
+specific performance outcomes as well as the operational methodology, decision-making
+protocols, and adaptive mechanisms that will govern the contractual performance partnership.
+Price arrangement may utilize any contract types described in this regulation, hybrid of multiple
+types, or an alternative contract type proposed by an offeror.
+The essence of outcome-based contracting is transforming the government-contractor
+relationship from a transactional exchange to a strategic partnership unified around delivery of
+defined performance outcomes, with contractual structures that make that partnership legally
+binding and mutually beneficial. Rather than purchasing predetermined solutions or discrete
+services, the government is contracting for participation in a structured business process
+designed to continuously optimize mission achievement through collaborative problem-solving,
+shared accountability, and actual delivery. This represents a fundamental evolution beyond both
+traditional contracting and performance-based contracting toward true collaborative governance
+models.
+The fundamental distinction lies in the partnership model: both parties have "skin in the game"
+for success or failure, creating aligned incentives that transcend the traditional buyer-seller
+dynamic. This partnership is built on an iterative, adaptive framework that emphasizes
+continuous refinement and collaborative problem-solving throughout the contract lifecycle.
+Key Distinguishing Features:
+1. Adaptive Performance Framework: While metrics matter, they serve as guideposts for
+course correction rather than rigid compliance checkboxes. The contract structure allows
+for metric evolution as understanding of optimal outcomes develops through
+performance experience. This framework incorporates regular retrospectives and
+performance reviews that focus on learning and adaptation rather than merely
+compliance measurement.
+2. Joint Problem-Solving Protocols: When performance challenges arise, both parties are
+contractually obligated to collaborate on solutions rather than defaulting to adversarial
+positions. This includes agreed upon protocols to modify approaches, reallocate
+resources, or adjust timelines in service of outcome achievement through rapid response
+cycles and joint decision-making processes.
+3. Shared Risk and Reward Structure: Both government and contractor share
+consequences of success or failure. The government commits resources, decision-
+making authority, and organizational support while the contractor commits expertise,
+innovation, and performance guarantees. This shared accountability creates a
+foundation for iterative improvement cycles where both parties are invested in
+continuous optimization of service delivery.
+4. Collaborative and Transparent Goal Setting: Rather than the government unilaterally
+defining requirements that contractors respond to, parties work together to meet defined
+outcomes aligned to programmatic objectives, success metrics, and implementation
+approaches. This leverages contractor expertise in solution design while ensuring
+government mission alignment. The collaborative and transparent approach recognizes
+that optimal solutions often emerge through actual delivery and incremental learning
+rather than upfront specification.
+95
+Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Companion
+FC 37.201-2(b) Determining if a contract is for personal services.
+Evaluate each service requirement based on its unique facts and circumstances. As you do so,
+the primary consideration is whether the government will maintain relatively continuous
+supervision and control over the contractor's personnel. For instance, the sporadic,
+unauthorized supervision of only one of a large number of contractor employees might
+reasonably be considered not relevant to a determination of whether a contract is for personal
+services, while relatively continuous government supervision of a substantial number of
+contractor employees would be a strong consideration.
+When considering whether a proposed contract is personal, consider factors such as:
+● Performance on site.
+● Principal tools and equipment furnished by the government.
+● Services are applied directly to the integral effort of agencies or an organizational
+subpart in furtherance of assigned function or mission.
+● Comparable services, meeting comparable needs, are performed in the same or similar
+agencies using civil service personnel.
+● The need for the type of service provided can reasonably be expected to last beyond
+one year.
+● The inherent nature of the service, or the manner in which it is provided reasonably
+requires directly or indirectly, government direction or supervision of contractor
+employees in order to:
+○ Adequately protect the government's interest;
+○ Retain control of the function involved; or
+○ Retain full personal responsibility for the function supported in a duly authorized
+federal officer or employee.
+Personal services contracts for the services of individual experts or consultants are limited by
+the Classification Act. In addition, the Office of Personnel Management has established
+requirements which apply in acquiring the personal services of experts or consultants in this
+manner (e.g., benefits, taxes, conflicts of interest). Coordinate with the cognizant civilian
+personnel office as necessary.
+FC 37.802-5 Strategic inclusion of “continuity of services” and “option to extend
+services” clauses.
+Contract awards for recurring and continuous service requirements are often delayed by factors
+outside the acquisition team's control, such as bid protests, disruptions to the incumbent
+contractor's business, or alleged bidding errors. To prevent difficult negotiations for short
+contract extensions, consider including FAR clauses 52.217-8, Options to Extend Services, and
+52.237-3, Continuity of Services, in solicitations and contracts for services where the services
+under the contract are vital and must be continued without interruption.
+Together, these clauses provide up to six additional months of performance beyond the stated
+contract period for unforeseen delays; and up to 90 days for a smooth transition to the
+successor contractor or to the government.
+96
+Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Companion