FAR Companion Change

Back to FAR Companion

Summary

PART_42 updated: 144 lines added, 1 lines removed

Diff

--- previous
+++ current
@@ -1 +1,147 @@
-Part 42 - Contract Administration and Audit Services .............................................................. 104+Part 42 - Contract Administration and Audit Services
+FC 42.001 Interagency agreements.
+When an interagency agreement is established, the agencies are encouraged to consider
+establishing procedures for the resolution of issues that may arise under the agreement.
+FC 42.002(b) Cognizant federal agency.
+If, at the end of the 5-year period, another agency has the largest dollar amount of negotiated
+contracts, including options, the two agencies should coordinate and determine which will
+assume cognizance. However, if circumstances warrant it and the affected agencies agree,
+cognizance may transfer prior to the expiration of the 5-year period.
+FC 42.3 Contract correspondence.
+Correspondence concerning contract administration functions should typically be routed through
+the cognizant contract administration office (CAO) by the contracting officer (or other contracting
+agency personnel) to the contractor, with a copy provided for the CAO's records. In urgent
+situations where direct communication with the contractor is necessary, a copy of the
+correspondence should be sent to the CAO simultaneously. The CAO, in turn, should furnish
+104
+Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Companion
+the contracting office with copies of relevant correspondence exchanged between the CAO and
+the contractor.
+FC 42.3 Visits to contractors’ facilities.
+When government personnel plan a visit to a contractor's facility in connection with government
+contracts, they should notify the cognizant Contract Administration Office (CAO) in advance.
+This notification allows the CAO to make necessary arrangements and helps avoid redundant
+reviews, requests, investigations, and audits concerning contract administration functions
+delegated to the CAO under FAR subpart 42.3. The notification should include, at a minimum,
+the following information:
+● Visitors’ names, official positions, and security clearances.
+● Date and duration of visit.
+● Name and address of contractor and personnel to be contacted.
+● Contract number, program involved, and purpose of visit.
+● If desired, visitors to a contractor’s plant may request that a representative of the CAO
+accompany them. In any event, the CAO has final authority to decide whether a
+representative should accompany a visitor.
+FC 42.3 Evaluation of contract administration offices.
+Onsite inspections or evaluations of the performance of the assigned functions of a contract
+administration office should be accomplished only by or under the direction of the agency of
+which that office is a part.
+FC 42.3 Postaward orientation.
+A contract award isn’t the finish line—it’s the starting point. It is up to the contracting officer to
+decide whether a postaward orientation in any form is necessary. Postaward orientation
+(sometimes called “kick-offs”), whether a full meeting/conference or a well-crafted letter, helps
+everyone involved understand the expectations, spot potential issues early, and build a solid
+working relationship from the start.
+Remember that postaward orientation is not a substitute for the contractor fully understanding
+the work requirements at the time offers are submitted, and is not to be used to alter the final
+agreement arrived at in any negotiations leading to contract award. In other words, postaward
+orientation does not change what is in the contract, it simply clarifies and reinforces it to ensure
+the parties have a clear and mutual understanding of the contract requirements.
+Postaward orientation can be especially valuable for contractors who are new to federal work,
+small businesses still learning the ropes, or for mission-critical contracts that are more nuanced
+and complex. It is most effective when held soon after award and tailored to the contract’s
+complexity, the contractor’s experience, delivery timeline, safety concerns, and other key factors
+necessary for successful delivery.
+If the contract is straightforward, a letter may be all that’s needed. For more complex efforts, an
+in-person or virtual meeting may be a smart investment of time. Solicitations and resultant
+contracts should specify the requirement for a postaward orientation meeting, especially if one
+105
+Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Companion
+would be convened in person / on-site, so that offerors can account for time and travel-related
+expenses.
+If a postaward orientation is held, the contracting officer takes the lead and establishes the time
+and place, sets the agenda, brings the right stakeholders to the table, and document key
+takeaways. It’s also a good time to remind participants that any change to the contract can be
+accomplished only by formal contract modification executed by the contracting officer.
+Bottom line: use postaward orientation to set the tone, establish clear expectations, and reduce
+friction later on. It can make a big difference in successful delivery.
+FC 42.3 Selecting contracts for postaward orientation.
+When deciding on the necessity and form of post-award orientation, contracting officers should
+consider:
+● Prior discussions and pre-award surveys;
+● Contract type, value, and complexity;
+● Product/service complexity and acquisition history;
+● Spare parts requirements;
+● Delivery urgency and program criticality;
+● Production cycle length;
+● Subcontracting extent;
+● Contractor's performance history and experience;
+● Contractor's small business status;
+● Contractor's small business subcontracting performance;
+● Safety precautions for hazardous materials/operations;
+● Complex financing arrangements (e.g., progress payments, advance payments,
+guaranteed loans).
+FC 42.3 Postaward subcontractor conferences.
+The prime contractor is generally responsible for conducting postaward conferences with
+subcontractors. However, the prime contractor may invite government representatives to a
+conference with subcontractors, or the government may request that the prime contractor
+initiate a conference with subcontractors. The prime contractor should ensure that
+representatives from involved contract administration offices are invited.
+Government representatives should recognize the lack of privity of contract between the
+government and subcontractors; not take action that is inconsistent with or alters subcontracts;
+and ensure that any changes in direction or commitment affecting the prime contractor are
+made by written direction of the contracting officer to the prime contractor.
+FC 42.302 Contract administration environment.
+Successful mission delivery hinges on robust postaward administration. This helps to ensure
+successful performance, mitigates risks, and maximizes value.
+When unforeseen challenges inevitably arise post-award, encouraging collaborative problem
+solving should be expected, not overlooked. Taking the time and effort to implement practices
+106
+Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Companion
+that will make administration more efficient enables effective adaptation, knowing when and how
+to pivot due to changing circumstances.
+This includes managing the change process with contract modifications, continuously assessing
+and mitigating risks, and embracing flexibility to adjust as needed. For example, scheduling
+check-ins to track progress and identify risk (e.g. project tasks and blockers that are
+communicated daily during a scrum in the IT world or potential change orders in the
+construction domain), quick informal communication methods (e.g. phone calls, text, or other
+means to communicate in realtime) to resolve minor issues promptly and prevent escalation,
+and performance monitoring to drive improvement - Did we meet the target deliverable or
+outcome? If not, what happened? Tell me more.
+Listen actively to understand different perspectives and consistently focus on collaborative
+solutions to overcome emerging challenges. When in doubt, get curious and ask questions that
+will promote better understanding and manage expectations.
+FC 42.5 Distribution of documents.
+The contracting officer or auditor should promptly distribute executed copies of the indirect cost
+rate agreement to the contractor and to each affected contracting agency and should provide
+copies of the agreement for the contract files, in accordance with the guidance for contract
+modifications in FAR part 4. Copies of the negotiation memorandum prepared under contracting
+officer determination or audit report prepared under auditor determination should be furnished,
+as appropriate, to the contracting offices and government audit offices.
+FC 42.8 Production surveillance and reporting.
+The government should maintain surveillance of contractor performance as necessary to protect
+its interests. The contracting officer administering the contract determines the extent of
+surveillance. When needed, contracting officers may require contractors to submit production
+progress reports. Reporting requirements should be limited to essential information and take
+advantage of data output generated by contractor systems whenever possible. Contract
+administration offices should verify report accuracy and advise the contracting officer of any
+required action. They may also initiate written reports to alert the contracting officer (and
+inventory manager, if applicable) of potential or actual performance delays, providing timely
+advice and recommendations.
+FC 42.11 Continuous performance monitoring.
+Continuous performance monitoring will aid the contracting officers in preparing the required
+performance evaluations.
+By combining targeted progress reports with monitoring from contract administration personnel
+see FC 42.8), contracting officers gain a continuous, data-driven view of performance, enabling
+them to address issues early, make informed decisions, and ultimately contribute to accurate
+and quality information in CPARS to inform both continued performance under the current
+contract and future acquisition decisions.
+107
+Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Companion
+FC 42.1103(d) Evaluation of Federal Prison Industries (FPI) performance.
+Evaluation of Federal Prison Industries (FPI) performance may be used to support a waiver
+request (see FAR 8.304) when FPI is a mandatory source in accordance with FAR subpart 8.1.
+The completed evaluation should not be released to other than government personnel and the
+contractor whose performance is being evaluated during the period. Disclosure of such
+information could cause harm both to the commercial interest of the government and to the
+competitive position of the contractor being evaluated as well as impede the efficiency of
+government operations.