FAR Companion Change
| Date Detected | 2026-03-11 09:24 UTC |
| Type | COMPANION_MODIFIED |
| Entity | PART_44 |
Summary
PART_44 updated: 64 lines added, 1 lines removed
Diff
--- previous +++ current @@ -1 +1,64 @@ -Part 44 - Subcontracting Policies and Procedures .................................................................. 108+Part 44 - Subcontracting Policies and Procedures +FC 44.000 Scope. +Small business subcontracting plan requirements and policies are not covered in FAR part 44, +as they are addressed in FAR part 19. +FC 44.000(b) Notice and consent requirements under commercial contracts. +Because the consent and advance notification requirements in FAR subpart 44.2 do not apply to +prime contracts involving commercial products or commercial services, the clauses outlined in +that subpart (e.g., FAR 52.244-2, Subcontracts), are generally not applicable to prime contracts +for commercial products or commercial services, regardless of contract type. +FAR clause 52.244-6, Subcontracts for Commercial Products and Commercial Services, +prescribed in FAR 12.205(b)(2), Table 12-3, and FAR 44.403, does not impose consent or +notice requirements on the prime contractor. If maintaining specific major subcontractors +identified in the proposal or quotation is crucial to the performance of the contract (e.g., +commercial time-and-material contracts), the contracting officer may want to consider +incorporating relevant consent or notification requirements into the contract or order. +FC 44.201-1 Consent requirements. +The contracting officer may require consent to subcontract even when the contractor has an +approved purchasing system. This is done to protect the government. Such subcontracts may +include critical systems, subsystems, components, or services. These can be identified by +subcontract number or by class of items (e.g., subcontracts for engines on a prime contract for +airframes). +Consent may be required for subcontracts under prime contracts for architect-engineer services. +The contracting officer’s written authorization for the contractor to purchase from government +sources (see FAR part 8) constitutes consent. +108 +Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Companion +FC 44.201-3 Contracting officer’s evaluation considerations. +When consenting to a subcontract, the contracting officer should review the request and +supporting data, considering: +● Consistency with the contractor’s make-or-buy program (FAR 15.405-2). +● Availability of special test equipment, equipment, or real property from government +sources. +● Technical justification for selecting supplies, equipment, or services. +● Contractor compliance with prime contract requirements for small business +subcontracting (FAR part 19) and purchases from nonprofit agencies for the blind or +severely disabled (FAR part 8). +● Adequacy of price competition or justified absence thereof. +● Assessment and disposal of alternate proposals. +● Sound basis for selecting and determining subcontractor responsibility. +● Adequate cost/price analysis and obtaining certified/other than certified cost or pricing +data. +● Appropriateness of proposed subcontract type for risks and policy. +● Adequate consideration for subcontracts using government-provided equipment/real +property. +● Accurate translation of prime contract technical requirements. +● Compliance with applicable cost accounting standards. +● Subcontractor exclusion status in System for Award Management (FAR subpart 9.4). +FC 44.301 Extent of contractor purchasing system reviews. +A contractor purchasing system review (CPSR) requires an evaluation of the contractor’s +purchasing system. Unless segregation of subcontracts is impracticable, this evaluation should +not include subcontracts awarded by the contractor exclusively in support of government +contracts that are competitively awarded firm-fixed-price, competitively awarded fixed-price with +economic price adjustment, or awarded for commercial products and commercial services +pursuant to FAR part 12. The considerations listed above (see FC44.201-3) should also be +used to evaluate the contractor’s purchasing system, including the contractor’s policies, +procedures, and performance under that system. Special attention should be given to– +● The results of market research accomplished; +● The degree of price competition obtained; +● Pricing policies and techniques, including methods of obtaining certified cost or pricing +data, and data other than certified cost or pricing data; +● Methods of evaluating subcontractor responsibility, including the contractor’s use of the +System for Award Management Exclusions (see FAR part 9) and, if the contractor has +subcontracts with parties on the Exclusions list, the documentation, systems, and +procedures the contractor has established to protect the government’s interests (see