52.214-14 Place of Performance—Sealed Bidding.
Revolutionary FAR Overhaul (RFO) Version
A revised version of this clause has been published under the Revolutionary FAR Overhaul (EO 14275). The RFO version supersedes the eCFR text below for contracts using the RFO FAR model. The RFO text is not duplicated here; see the clause page for a side-by-side comparison: https://part52.dev/clause/52-214-14/#rfo
Prescription and Applicability
FAR Prescription, 14.201-6(h)
(h) Insert the provision at 52.214-14, Place of Performance-Sealed Bidding, in invitations for bids except those in which the place of performance is specified by the government.
DFARS Supplementary Guidance, 214.201-6
(2) Use the provisions at 252.215-7007, Notice of Intent to Resolicit, and 252.215-7008, Only One Offer, as prescribed at 215.371-6 and 215.408(3), respectively.
Current Text
52.214-14 Place of Performance—Sealed Bidding.
As prescribed in 14.201-6(h), insert the following provision:
Place of Performance—Sealed Bidding (APR 1985)
(a) The bidder, in the performance of any contract resulting from this solicitation, □ intends, □ does not intend [ check applicable box ] to use one or more plants or facilities located at a different address from the address of the bidder as indicated in this bid.
(b) If the bidder checks intends in paragraph (a) above, it shall insert in the spaces provided below the required information:
Place of Performance (Street Address, City, County, State, Zip Code)
Name and Address of Owner and Operator of the Plant or Facility if Other than Bidder
(End of provision)
[48 FR 42478, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 50 FR 1746, Jan. 11, 1985; 50 FR 52429, Dec. 23, 1985]
Active Class Deviations Affecting This Clause
Class Deviation 2026-O0043, DFARS RFO Implementation (Part 4)
- Status: Active
- Date Issued: 2026-02-17
- Change type: MODIFIED
- Action: Add clause 52.214-14
Suggested Questions
You can ask your AI assistant:
- Should I include this provision in my solicitation?
- Does this clause apply to commercial acquisitions?
- Does this clause apply to R&D contracts under Part 35?
- Which alternate should I use for a multiple-award contract?
- Are there any active Class Deviations that modify this clause?
- What changed in the most recent amendment?