A community resource for the acquisition workforce not a .gov website
part52.dev Federal Acquisition Clause Monitor
This page provides structured context for use with AI assistants like Gemini or ChatGPT. Copy the URL and provide it to your assistant, or use the "Copy for AI assistant" button below to copy the text content directly. A plain-text Markdown version is also available.
Download .md

52.215-6 Place of Performance.

Prescription and Applicability

FAR Prescription, 15.209(f)

(f) The contracting officer shall insert the provision at 52.215-6, Place of Performance, in solicitations unless the place of performance is specified by the Government.

DFARS Supplementary Guidance, 215.209

(a) For source selections when the procurement is $100 million or more, contracting officers should use the provision at FAR 52.215-1, Instructions to Offerors--Competitive Acquisition, with its Alternate I.

Current Text

52.215-6 Place of Performance.

As prescribed in 15.209(f), insert the following provision:

Place of Performance (OCT 1997)

(a) The offeror or respondent, in the performance of any contract resulting from this solicitation, □ intends, □ does not intend [ check applicable block ] to use one or more plants or facilities located at a different address from the address of the offeror or respondent as indicated in this proposal or response to request for information.

(b) If the offeror or respondent checks "intends" in paragraph (a) of this provision, it shall insert in the following spaces the required information:

Place of performance (street address, city, state, county, zip code)

Name and address of owner and operator of the plant or facility if other than offeror or respondent

(End of provision)

[62 FR 51261, Sept. 30, 1997]

Suggested Questions

You can ask your AI assistant:

  • Should I include this provision in my solicitation?
  • Does this clause apply to commercial acquisitions?
  • Does this clause apply to R&D contracts under Part 35?
  • Which alternate should I use for a multiple-award contract?
  • Are there any active Class Deviations that modify this clause?
  • What changed in the most recent amendment?