A community resource for the acquisition workforce not a .gov website
part52.dev Federal Acquisition Clause Monitor
This page provides structured context for use with AI assistants like Gemini or ChatGPT. Copy the URL and provide it to your assistant, or use the "Copy for AI assistant" button below to copy the text content directly. A plain-text Markdown version is also available.
Download .md

52.222-22 Previous Contracts and Compliance Reports.

Prescription and Applicability

FAR Prescription, 22.810(a)

(a) When a contract is contemplated that will include the clause at 52.222-26, Equal Opportunity, the contracting officer shall insert-

(1) The clause at 52.222-21, Prohibition of Segregated Facilities, in the solicitation and contract; and

(2) The provision at 52.222-22, Previous Contracts and Compliance Reports, in the solicitation.

Current Text

52.222-22 Previous Contracts and Compliance Reports.

As prescribed in 22.810(a)(2), insert the following provision:

Previous Contracts and Compliance Reports (FEB 1999)

The offeror represents that—

(a) It squ; has, □ has not participated in a previous contract or subcontract subject to the Equal Opportunity clause of this solicitation;

(b) It □ has, □ has not, filed all required compliance reports; and

(c) Representations indicating submission of required compliance reports, signed by proposed subcontractors, will be obtained before subcontract awards.

(End of provision)

[48 FR 42478, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 63 FR 70286, Dec. 18, 1998]

Active Class Deviations Affecting This Clause

Class Deviation 2025-O0003, Class Deviation 2025-O0003 – Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity in Federal Contracts

  • Status: Active
  • Date Issued: 2025-03-04
  • Change type: MODIFIED
  • Action: Modify clause 52.222-22

Suggested Questions

You can ask your AI assistant:

  • Should I include this provision in my solicitation?
  • Does this clause apply to commercial acquisitions?
  • Does this clause apply to R&D contracts under Part 35?
  • Which alternate should I use for a multiple-award contract?
  • Are there any active Class Deviations that modify this clause?
  • What changed in the most recent amendment?